has spent huge sums of cash attempting to influence New Mexico’s residents and state legislators over the past three years, the goliath developer doesn’t appear very diligent when it comes to complying with state lobbying law.
SunCal’s latest request of the state’s taxpayers is $690 million worth of tax increment development district (TIDD) bonds to develop a 55,000 acre tract of land to the west of Albuquerque.
The measure was shot down last year,
but bills have resurfaced this year in both the state
A complaint filed by Albuquerque resident Lora Lucero last week accused SunCal of
failing to comply with the state Lobbyist Regulation Act
SunCal has mounted a massive public relations campaign, using billboards, radio spots, and
TIDDs Keep Our Families Together!
”) in an attempt to sway public opinion on the public bonding capacity it has requested from the state.
Lobbyist Regulation Act
requires that all lobbying and related expenses be disclosed to the state within 48 hours of the expenditure. This includes advertising, mailers to constituents concerning legislation and polls conducted concerning legislation.
As of the beginning of last week, SunCal had
only reported one expense
The noncompliance complaint sparked an onslaught of critical media to which the company responded midweek by
filing current expenditures reports
with the state.
(As of this posting, they have not yet been made available on the Secretary of State’s website.)
Opposition is mounting to the company’s explicitly political methods of procuring public bonds.
Real estate developers in New Mexico
outspend other lobbies
by leaps and bounds.
During the 2006 election cycle, the real estate/development industry donated nearly $1.5 million to state politicians’ political campaigns.
(Forest City Covington, the development company that pushed to enact the legislation enabling the creation of
, spent $150,000 alone.)
SunCal is also encountering criticism in other locales for its insistence on using taxpayers' money as a business strategy.
In Alameda, California, the company is seeking a roughly
$700 million subsidy
for a proposed development.
Public subsidies are rarely granted without generating a little controversy, and to counter this in Alameda, SunCal
contacted residents with a telephone survey
about a legislative measure that would exempt the company from the city’s growth management plan.
Some residents who received the call contend that the survey was designed to disseminate information (a technique sometimes known as a push poll) about the measure in a way that was partial to SunCal’s political and financial objectives.
All of this is surfacing at a time when subsidiaries and affiliates of the company are experiencing a
wave of bankruptcies
Fifteen of these bankrupt projects were
partnerships with evaporated financial giant, Lehman Brothers
SunCal projects are defaulting on loans, failing to make payments to contractors, and getting slapped with liens, lawsuits, and repossessions in multiple states.
In the context of a tanking residential real estate markets and strapped state and local budgets, betting on a company whose subsidiaries and affiliates are missing payments to their creditors, relying on massive subsidies, and being accused of noncompliance with state lobbying regulations sounds like a poor investment decision, wouldn’t you agree?