As I posted
previously,
NYC is considering handing over more
dough
to America’s favorite – and possibly richest – pastime. Since then the plan to give tax breaks to Major League Baseball caught the attention of
The New York Times
. The Times story caught the attention of other
reporters
forcing Bloomberg to defending the MLB plan, including during his weekly call in show on Friday when he was asked why the city continues to subsidize baseball teams and big firms, like Merrill Lynch. (The
Merrill Lynch deal
has more holes than Swiss Cheese, but it was approved under Guiliani, not Bloomberg). The Mayor’s
defense
is, hey, we got a good deal at only spending $75 million (each) on Yankee and Shea (err….
Citi Field
) Stadiums.What? I guess giving $150 million of someone else’s hard earned money is like chump change to the Mayor. And the Mayor neglected to mention his deals for
Goldman Sachs
,
Pfizer
,
American Stock Exchange
among others. But I wonder what the mayor's defense would be if he had his facts straight? The
real
New York City figure is closer to $400 million – and that’s just for the Yankees. Throw in Shea Stadium and the teams are tapping into well over
$1 billion in city, state and federal subsidies
All this from a man who built a business worth
$4.7 billion
and rejected a subsidy for his company's new office tower in 2001 since location isn’t a “
function of tax breaks
.”